Dash cam caught everything — adjuster still wants 'more info'?? What actually helped you?
So I finally had a reason to be glad I spent the money on a dash cam. Got rear-ended at a slow-moving merge point a few weeks ago — the footage is honestly pretty damning. You can clearly see the other driver drifting into my lane and making contact while I'm completely stopped. No ambiguity.
I submitted the clip to my insurance and figured that would basically close the loop. Nope. The adjuster came back saying they needed "additional context" to fully evaluate the claim. Like... what more context do you need than video evidence of the actual collision?
Now I'm sitting here with:
- The original full video file (about 4 minutes)
- A trimmed 45-second clip of just the incident
- GPS and speed data my camera logged
- A bunch of photos of both cars after
- A written timeline I typed up that same night
I don't want to just blast them with a chaotic folder of everything and make it harder for them to actually look at it. But I also don't want to leave something out that turns out to matter.
For anyone who's been through this — what format or combination of stuff actually moved things forward for you? Did the GPS data matter? Did a written timeline help? Did sending too much ever backfire? I feel like I'm overthinking this but the adjuster's vagueness is making me paranoid.