Insurer denied my UM claim because of a technicality — can they actually do this?
I'm honestly at a loss right now and could use some outside perspective from people who've been through something similar.
About a week ago I got hit by someone who blew a red light and smashed into my driver's side door. The other driver had zero insurance — nothing. I was shaken up pretty bad, went to urgent care that same night, and filed a claim with my own insurance the next morning.
Here's where it gets infuriating. The car I was driving is technically in my brother's name because he co-signed when I bought it — I make every single payment, I'm listed on the policy as a primary driver, and the car's VIN is right there on the declarations page. We have uninsured motorist coverage specifically for situations like this.
But the adjuster called me yesterday and said they're "reviewing coverage" and hinted that because my brother is the registered owner and he's not the one who got hit, there may be a coverage issue. Like... what? The car is on the policy. I am on the policy. I was the one driving and I'm the one with a banged-up shoulder and a totaled door panel.
Have any of you dealt with insurance trying to wiggle out of a UM claim on a technicality like this? Is there something I should be doing right now — documenting stuff, pushing back somehow, anything? I really can't afford to just eat these medical bills and repair costs.
Any advice from people who've been in a similar spot would mean a lot. I'm trying not to panic but this feels really unfair.