Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
spry-stoat-597

Parked at a red light, car behind me rolled into me — they're saying I'm 15% at fault??

Still kind of in disbelief over this so bear with me.

A few weeks ago I was completely stopped at a red light. The car behind me apparently didn't shift into park or something, because it slowly rolled forward and crunched into my rear bumper. I wasn't moving. My foot was on the brake. The light was still red.

The other driver was super apologetic at the scene and even told the responding officer it was entirely her fault. I figured this would be straightforward.

Fast forward to dealing with her insurance company. They called me a few times asking really specific questions — like whether I had checked my mirrors recently, whether I had any warning the car was drifting toward me, whether I tried to pull forward to create more space. I answered honestly. I said I was watching the light, not staring at my rearview mirror every two seconds.

Now they've come back saying I'm 15% at fault because I "could have taken evasive action" or something along those lines. I still don't fully understand their reasoning.

So now everything is slower — the body shop stuff, the rental reimbursement, all of it. And when I asked about disputing this, the rep kind of shrugged it off and said the determination had already been made by their claims team.

Is this even a real thing? Can an insurance company seriously say I should have moved my parked car to avoid someone rolling into me? Has anyone dealt with this and actually gotten the fault split reversed? I don't know if I need a lawyer or if I'm overreacting.

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle