Rear-ended at a red light 2 years ago — is my settlement offer actually fair or am I getting lowballed?
So this has been dragging on forever and I just need some outside perspective from people who've actually been through it.
Short version: I was sitting completely stopped at a red light when someone plowed into the back of me. The hit was hard enough that my car got pushed into the intersection. Visually the bumper damage didn't look catastrophic but my body definitely felt it — I had neck stiffness and headaches for months afterward.
I saw my primary care doc pretty quickly and then ended up doing a solid stretch of physical therapy. Missed about two weeks of work total (I do freelance/contract work so that math gets complicated). The at-fault driver's insurance covered my car repairs without too much of a fight, thankfully.
Here's where I'm frustrated: I got a lawyer involved after the insurance company started giving me the runaround on the injury side. That was almost two years ago. I would go months without hearing anything unless I reached out first. Now suddenly my attorney is pushing me toward a settlement number that honestly feels lower than I expected given how long this has taken and how much the PT bills added up.
I'm starting to wonder:
- Is this number actually reasonable for a case like mine, or is my lawyer just trying to close it out?
- Should I have just handled the injury claim myself from the start?
- At what point do you cut your losses vs. push back?
I'm not trying to get rich off this — I just want to feel like I'm not walking away with less than I deserve after two years of stress and waiting. Anyone been in a similar spot?