At-fault insurer trying to use aftermarket parts on my 2-year-old car — can I fight this?
So I'm still pretty frustrated about this whole situation and hoping someone here has been through something similar.
Got rear-ended at a stoplight about six weeks ago. The other driver's insurance accepted full liability — no dispute there. My car is barely two years old and has maybe 28,000 miles on it. It's in great shape otherwise and I've kept up with everything.
The damage is to the rear quarter panel, the trunk lid, one taillight assembly, and some of the bumper structure underneath. When I got the repair estimate back from the adjuster, I noticed every single replacement part was listed as aftermarket. Not a single OEM part in the whole estimate.
I called and asked about it and the rep basically said 'aftermarket parts are of comparable quality and this is standard practice.' That felt like a rehearsed answer honestly.
Here's my issue — I paid for a specific car. The manufacturer engineered those parts together. I don't want some third-party company's version of my taillight rattling around back there in six months or not fitting flush. And frankly, if I ever go to sell this car, I want to be able to say it was repaired with real parts.
Does anyone know if I actually have the right to demand OEM here? Is this something worth pushing back on, or am I going to hit a wall? Should I get my own shop involved to write a competing estimate? Really appreciate any experience people can share.