Insurance calling our crash 'minor' and refusing injury claims — can they just do that??
So this happened a few weeks ago. Someone rolled a stop sign and clipped the rear corner of my car pretty hard. My teenage son and I were both in the car, and the impact whipped our heads sideways because we were both turned looking at a dog on the side of the road right when it happened. Went straight to urgent care, both had neck stiffness and I had serious upper back pain radiating into my shoulder.
Fast forward to now — my son is mostly feeling better but I'm still going to physical therapy twice a week. The other driver's insurance looked at the photos of my car and basically said the damage looked 'cosmetic' and they're not going to pay out on injury claims without 'substantial proof of harm.'
Couple of things making me furious:
1. I have proof. Urgent care records, PT notes, a referral for an MRI. How is that not substantial? 2. My son was in a booster seat. The pediatrician told us we need to replace it after any crash, even if it looks fine. The insurance is dragging their feet on that too. It's a child safety item — how can they question it?
I live in a no-fault state so I've been filing through my own insurance but they're being just as dismissive. I'm not trying to get rich here. I just want my PT covered and to not have to argue about a booster seat.
Has anyone dealt with this? Did you push back and actually get somewhere, or did you have to get a lawyer involved? Feeling really lost right now.
