Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
quiet-swan-499

3-car chain reaction — one driver uninsured — which coverage actually applies here?

Hey everyone, hoping someone has dealt with something like this before because my brain is fried trying to figure out the coverage angle.

So I was stopped at a red light, first car in line. Behind me, a delivery van rear-ended a sedan, which sent the sedan flying into my bumper. The sedan driver — the one who physically hit me — turns out has zero insurance. The delivery van that started the whole thing does have insurance.

Here's where I'm confused: the sedan is what made contact with my car, but it was basically a projectile at that point. The van driver caused the whole thing. So who am I actually filing against?

My own policy has both uninsured motorist (UM) and collision coverage. The deductibles are different — UM is a bit lower, which obviously matters to me right now since my car has a decent amount of damage.

I've been going back and forth reading my policy documents and honestly it's written in a way that feels deliberately confusing. One section seems to say UM only applies when the uninsured vehicle is the proximate cause, another part just says direct physical contact.

Has anyone been in a multi-car pileup where one of the drivers was uninsured? Did your insurance company try to push you toward collision (higher deductible) even when UM seemed like it should apply? I don't want to just take whatever they tell me without understanding my options first.

Also — do I need to file against both drivers separately, or does one claim cover everything?

Any insight is genuinely appreciated. This whole thing happened so fast and I'm still kind of shaken up.

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle