Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
kind-owl-537

At-fault driver had zero insurance — do I even have the right to go after them personally?

This has been eating at me for a while and I finally need to talk it through with people who might get it.

About 18 months ago a guy blew through a red light and slammed into my driver's side door. Totaled my car — a used SUV I'd saved up for over two years working double shifts. That car meant everything to me because I bought it completely on my own, no help from anyone.

Turns out he had let his insurance lapse like three weeks before the crash. He got cited for it at the scene. Then — and this still makes my blood boil — he went and got a new policy the following week and somehow used that to get his ticket reduced to basically nothing. How is that even legal?

Meanwhile I'm dealing with neck and shoulder pain that still hasn't fully gone away. I had some coverage through my own policy but it didn't come close to covering everything, and I burned through my savings just staying afloat during my recovery.

Here's my conflict: the guy genuinely does not seem to have much. I looked him up (publicly available stuff) and it's pretty clear he's not sitting on assets. I know there are ways to collect — like wage garnishment — but the idea of doing that to someone makes me uncomfortable, even though HE is the one who did this to ME.

Also I'll be honest — right after the accident I was going through some really dark personal stuff and pursuing any of this legally felt impossible. I wasn't in a place to fight anyone about anything. So I just... didn't. And now I'm wondering if I even still can, or if I've waited too long.

Is it wrong to pursue someone who's basically broke? And does waiting this long kill my chances entirely?

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle