At-fault driver's insurance denying liability even though dashcam + police report prove otherwise — help?
I'm so frustrated I could scream. About six weeks ago I was sitting completely still in a line of traffic on a surface street — engine barely running, waiting for the light — when a chain-reaction crash behind me turned into me getting sandwiched. The officer who responded literally wrote in the report that the rear driver (let's call them Driver C) triggered the whole thing. I also have my dashcam footage, which is pretty unambiguous.
My car is a total loss. Driver C carries their own insurer, and that insurer is flatly denying any fault. Like, zero acknowledgment. My own insurer has been decent so far — they confirmed I didn't do anything wrong and that the driver directly behind me isn't at fault either — but now they're nudging me toward just filing under my own collision coverage, paying my deductible, and signing over the title of my totaled car.
I'm not against using my own coverage if that's genuinely the right move, but something feels off about handing over my title before this is actually resolved. And honestly, my deductible isn't small — it would sting.
I've already sent Driver C's insurer a copy of the police report and a clip of the dashcam footage. Their adjuster just keeps saying they're "still investigating."
A few things I'm unsure about:
- Is going through my own collision coverage now going to somehow hurt my ability to get reimbursed later?
- Will my insurer actually subrogate against Driver C's insurer, and how hard will they fight?
- At what point does it make sense to get a PI attorney involved when it's only property damage so far (no injury claim yet)?
Any experience with this kind of runaround would really help right now. Thank you.