At-fault driver's insurance offered me peanuts for a rollover with no injuries — is this normal??
So I'm still kind of in shock about this and need some outside perspective from people who've actually been through it.
About six weeks ago I got hit broadside at an intersection — the other driver ran a red light and slammed into my driver's side door. My car spun out and ended up on its roof in a ditch. I'm talking a complete rollover. The car is absolutely totaled.
Here's the thing — I walked away. Shaken up, some bruising on my shoulder and ribs from the seatbelt, but the ER did a full workup and nothing was broken. No concussion. I was sore for a couple weeks but I'm mostly okay now physically.
My own insurance already handled the total loss payout on the vehicle, so that part is settled.
Now the at-fault driver's insurance has come back to me with an offer for what they're calling "pain and suffering / general disruption" — it's embarrassingly low. Like, the kind of number that makes you laugh because the alternative is crying. We're talking roughly what I'd spend on groceries for a couple months.
The adjuster keeps framing it like I should be grateful because my medical bills weren't enormous. But I was in a ROLLOVER. I had to rent a car for weeks. I missed several days of work. I'm still a little anxious driving through intersections.
Does the fact that I didn't have massive hospital bills mean I have no leverage here? Or is a lowball offer just... standard first-move stuff from their side?
Has anyone pushed back on something like this and actually gotten more? Would you take it or fight it?