Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
genuine-finch-865

At-fault driver's insurance only giving me 3 days rental after total loss — is that a joke?

So I got hit at an intersection a couple weeks ago — other driver ran a red light, slammed into my driver's side. Their insurance accepted liability pretty quickly, which I was relieved about. But then came the rental situation.

They totaled my car. Fine. I kind of saw that coming. But when I asked about a rental while I figure out my next vehicle, they came back and said they'd cover three days. Three. Days.

I don't know if you've ever tried to shop for, finance, and purchase a replacement car in 72 hours while also dealing with a sore neck and a stack of medical paperwork, but... it's not realistic. I haven't even wrapped my head around what I want to buy yet.

I've been going back and forth with their adjuster and honestly every conversation feels like I'm being managed rather than helped. Which brings me to my bigger question:

Should I even be running this through the at-fault driver's insurance at all?

I have my own policy with solid coverage — rental reimbursement, uninsured/underinsured, the works. I pay a lot for that coverage every month. Does it make more sense to just go through my own carrier and let them fight the other side? Or does that somehow work against me?

I'm not trying to game anyone, I just want to get a fair shake and not end up out of pocket because I picked the wrong path. Anyone been through this and figured out what actually works better? Really appreciate any insight.

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle