At-fault driver's insurance totaled my car but their payout math makes zero sense to me
So I got rear-ended about three weeks ago — completely the other driver's fault, police report confirms it. I filed a claim through their insurance (not mine) and things moved pretty fast at first. An adjuster came out, looked at the car, and then a few days later I got a letter saying it's a total loss.
Here's where I'm confused. They gave me some document with three different numbers on it:
- A "base vehicle value"
- An "adjusted vehicle value" (lower than the base??)
- And then the actual settlement offer, which is even lower than that
Like… how did we go from the adjusted value down to the offer number? There's no clear explanation. I called the adjuster and she gave me some word salad about "applicable deductions" but never actually broke it down.
I've never dealt with a total loss before. I bought this car a couple years ago and I still feel like it was worth more than what they're saying. I've been checking listings for similar cars online and finding them priced noticeably higher than their "base value."
Also — do I have any say in this? Can I push back or is their number basically final? I don't want to be difficult but I also don't want to get shortchanged because I don't know the process.
Any advice from people who've been through this would be really appreciated. Especially if you successfully negotiated a higher payout. What did you actually say or do?