Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
brave-swan-471

At-fault driver's insurer messed up my car's value then changed the rules on me — wtf?

So I'm completely lost and honestly pretty frustrated. I got rear-ended at a red light — zero fault on my part, the other driver even admitted it on scene. Their insurance accepted liability no problem. Fine.

Fast forward a few weeks and they tell me my car is a total loss. Their number was just barely over what the repairs would cost, so I figured okay, that's the math. But then I started digging and realized they had the wrong trim level listed for my car — like, a whole tier below what I actually own — and they didn't account for an upgraded sound system and new tires I'd put on less than six months ago. When I pushed back with documentation, they revised the actual cash value upward by a meaningful amount.

Now suddenly my car is not a total loss by their own math. Great, right? Except now they're saying they'll only pay repair costs up to some "retained value" or "salvage deduction" figure that nobody mentioned until this exact moment. It's like they invented a new rule the second their first approach stopped working.

We're deep into this process. I've already been without my car for almost three weeks. I have a rental that's about to hit the coverage limit.

I guess my questions are:

  • Is this "retained value cap" thing actually a real, standard practice or are they just making stuff up?
  • Do I have any leverage here since they were the ones with bad information to begin with?
  • Should I just lawyer up at this point?

I'm not trying to get rich. I just want my car fixed or fairly replaced. Any advice from people who've dealt with something like this would mean a lot right now.

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle