At-fault insurer totaled my car but their valuation is a joke — what do I even do?
So I'm about two weeks out from getting rear-ended at a red light by someone who 100% admitted fault at the scene. My car is newer — I bought it maybe four months ago and it was in genuinely great shape. I'd just had the brakes done and fixed a small AC issue the previous owner had let slide. That car was better than when I bought it.
The at-fault driver's insurance came back with a total-loss determination, which honestly surprised me because the damage looked repairable to me. But fine, okay, whatever — except their valuation is way off.
Here's what's messing with my head: one of the "comparable sales" they used to justify their number is essentially my own purchase transaction from four months ago. They pulled the price I paid, then knocked off a chunk for "condition" and another adjustment for the miles I've driven since. But I improved the car after buying it. How does it lose value for condition when I actively made it better?
I do have gap coverage so I'm not going to be underwater on the loan regardless. But honestly? I'd rather have my car repaired than replaced. It's a specific trim level that's hard to find, and I know exactly what I have mechanically. Starting over shopping sounds exhausting.
Questions I have: 1. Can I just write a letter disputing their comps and explaining the condition adjustments are wrong? 2. Do I need to get an independent appraisal to make this stick? 3. Is there any way to push back on total loss vs. repair if I think repair is the better call?
Any experience with this would really help. I feel like I'm getting steamrolled and I don't even know where to start.