Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
plain-raven-270

Attorneys keep bringing up my treatment gap — but I literally couldn't afford to go back

So I was rear-ended pretty badly at a red light about two years ago. The other driver was 100% at fault — there were witnesses, a police report, the whole thing. Liability isn't the question here.

I went to the ER the night it happened, got checked out, was told to follow up with a specialist. Here's the problem: my insurance situation was a mess at the time. I'd just lost my job a few weeks before the crash, COBRA was way too expensive, and I genuinely could not afford to keep going to appointments. I tried one follow-up visit and the out-of-pocket cost was just... not something I could swing while also trying to keep my lights on.

Fast forward to now — my neck and lower back are honestly worse than they were right after the accident. The pain never went away, I just learned to live with it because I had no choice.

I've talked to a few personal injury attorneys and they all keep flagging the gap in my treatment as a "significant weakness." I get it, I do. But it feels so unfair that I'm being penalized for being uninsured and broke through no fault of my own.

Has anyone dealt with something like this? Is there a way to explain the gap that actually holds up? Did you find doctors willing to document that the delay was financially motivated, not because you were healed?

I'm not trying to milk anything — I'm genuinely still hurting and just want some accountability from the guy who hit me. Feeling pretty defeated right now.

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle