Both insurers want to total my car over what feels like minor damage — can I just sue instead?
Really frustrated right now and hoping someone here has dealt with something similar.
A few weeks ago someone backed into my car in a grocery store parking lot — slow speed, but they were in a big pickup and caught my front fender and hood at a bad angle. The damage looks bad cosmetically but the car drives totally fine. I got an estimate from a body shop I trust and they said it's fixable, no structural issues, nothing crazy.
The problem: my car is older (though in genuinely great shape — I've kept up with everything, no prior accidents, clean title). Both the at-fault driver's insurer AND mine are now making noises about totaling it because apparently the repair quote pushes close to some percentage of the car's book value.
I do NOT want this car totaled. I love this car, it runs perfectly, and replacing it right now would be a nightmare given what used cars cost. The damage is real but it's cosmetic — we're not talking frame damage or airbags or anything like that.
I called the at-fault driver directly hoping to work something out privately and he basically hung up on me.
So now I'm wondering: can I just walk away from both insurance claims entirely and take this guy to small claims court for my repair costs? Has anyone actually done that? Is there a downside I'm not seeing?
I'm in a no-fault state if that matters, though I'm honestly not sure how much that changes things here. Any real-world experience appreciated.