Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
curious-badger-895

I caused a fender-bender but the other driver has pre-existing injuries — how scared should I really be?

I've been losing sleep over this and need some honest perspective from people who've actually dealt with the insurance/legal side of things.

About six weeks ago I misjudged a stop and tapped the car in front of me in a parking garage — maybe 5 mph, genuinely minimal impact. The other driver got out, seemed shaken but walked around fine. We exchanged info, I was polite, I reported it to my insurance immediately.

Here's where I'm spiraling: I've since learned through the claim process that the other driver has a documented history of back and neck problems from a prior incident. She's apparently been treating with a specialist for a couple of years already. Now her attorney has sent a letter of representation to my insurer.

I carry solid liability limits — well above what most people have — but I'm not naïve. I know medical bills can balloon, and I know "aggravation of a pre-existing condition" is a real legal theory. The thing is, I've built up a decent amount of wealth over my career. Liquid savings, investment accounts — enough that I'm not judgment-proof by any stretch.

My insurer has assigned a claims rep and says they'll handle everything, but I keep reading horror stories online about cases where the policy limits weren't enough and plaintiffs went after personal assets.

Realistic question: In a low-speed, clearly documented minor collision where the other party has significant pre-existing conditions, does a plaintiff's attorney realistically push past policy limits and into personal assets? Or is that mostly a fear that doesn't play out in practice?

I'm not trying to minimize her experience — if I aggravated something real, I feel terrible. I just need to understand my actual exposure here.

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle