Dad got rear-ended, injuries seem minor — is a lawyer even worth it for something like this?
Hey everyone. My dad (58) got hit from behind at a red light about three weeks ago. The other driver was clearly at fault — admitted it on the scene and everything. My dad went to urgent care the next day because his neck and upper back were bothering him, but nothing showed up on imaging. They basically told him to take it easy for a bit and gave him some anti-inflammatories.
Here's where I'm confused. His out-of-pocket medical costs so far are pretty low. He's not in agony or anything, just stiff and sore. The other driver's insurance has already reached out and seems eager to settle quickly — which honestly made me a little suspicious?
We did talk to one attorney who said they'd take it on contingency and mentioned physical therapy as a next step. I get that PT can be genuinely helpful, but I also wondered — is it sometimes recommended more to build a case value than because someone actually needs it? I don't want my dad doing weeks of treatment he doesn't need just to inflate a claim. That feels wrong to us both.
At the same time, I've read that soft tissue injuries can show up or get worse later, and settling too fast could leave him with bills he didn't expect.
So I guess my questions are:
- Is it naive to just negotiate directly with the insurance company for a minor claim like this?
- How do you know if PT is medically legit vs. just case-building?
- Is contingency worth it when the injuries seem pretty small?
Not looking for a lawyer to swoop in here necessarily, just real talk from people who've been through something similar. Thanks.