Diminished value offer feels insultingly low — is this normal or am I getting played?
So the other driver was found 100% at fault, my car got pretty badly damaged — we're talking a significant repair bill — and now the insurance company is offering me a diminished value (DV) payout that feels like a rounding error compared to what actually happened to my car's worth.
My car was in great shape before the crash. Clean history, well-maintained, relatively low miles for its age, higher trim level. Pre-accident the thing was worth a solid amount on the market. Now it's got a repair history attached to it forever, and the DV offer they sent over is... laughable. Like, I could barely take my family out to a nice dinner on what they're offering.
I asked them to explain their methodology and they sent over some dense formula-looking document that honestly raised more questions than it answered. It seems like they're using some kind of base percentage approach that completely ignores how the used car market actually works — like how buyers react specifically to structural or significant body repairs on the CarFax.
Has anyone actually pushed back on a DV offer and gotten somewhere? I keep reading that the first offer is almost always low, but I don't know if paying for an independent appraisal is worth it, or if there's a simpler way to challenge their math.
I've got a lot going on right now — little kids, job stuff, just a lot — so I'm trying to figure out if fighting this is genuinely worth my bandwidth or if I should just take it and move on. Gut says no, but I'm tired and could use some perspective from people who've actually been through this.