Insurance denied our claim after a hit-and-run on a parked car — we have video proof. How??
I'm still kind of in shock and honestly just need to vent and get some outside perspective from people who've dealt with this kind of thing.
A few weeks ago my dad's car was parked in a strip mall lot while he was waiting for my aunt to finish an errand. He was just sitting there, engine off, fully in a marked space. A driver in a larger vehicle clipped the rear quarter panel pretty hard pulling out of an adjacent space — hard enough that my dad felt the whole car lurch — and just... kept going. No stop, no note, nothing.
Here's the thing: we actually have a solid evidence trail.
- A police report was filed the same day as a hit-and-run
- The strip mall has camera footage clearly showing the other vehicle making contact
- A bystander saw it happen and gave a statement to the officer
- The other driver eventually came forward after the police contacted them (guess their plates were visible on the footage)
So their insurer just got back to us. Full denial. Their reasoning? They're claiming my dad was parked in a "non-designated" area of the lot (he absolutely was not — it's a clearly painted space) and that their driver "may not have been aware" contact was made.
I'm sorry — MAY NOT HAVE BEEN AWARE? There's literal video of the impact. My dad felt it. How is this even a position they can take?
I don't understand how a moving vehicle striking a completely stationary, properly parked car can somehow be disputed. Doesn't the moving driver have some basic duty to avoid hitting things that aren't moving?
Has anyone else had an insurer just flatly deny a claim like this when the evidence is this clear? What did you do next? Did you push back yourself or get someone involved? I don't even know where to start.