Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
candid-beaver-003

Insurance saying total loss but other driver's insurer says it's repairable — who do I trust?

So I'm stuck in this really confusing limbo right now and honestly just need some people who've been through this to weigh in.

About two weeks ago someone ran a red light and T-boned me pretty hard. My car got pushed sideways into a curb and the damage on the driver's side looks bad to my eyes — frame area, door, rear quarter panel all crumpled. My own insurance looked at photos and used the word "total loss" pretty casually. But the at-fault driver's insurer sent their own adjuster out and he kept emphasizing that the engine started fine afterward and that "structural damage isn't always what it looks like." They're saying it's repairable and they want to send it to one of their preferred shops.

I'm caught in the middle trying to figure out which side to believe. Obviously the at-fault insurer has a financial interest in calling it repairable rather than cutting a total loss check, right? But I also don't know if my own insurer is just being overly cautious.

The bigger stress right now: my car loan payment is due in about a week. If this thing ends up being totaled, I don't want to keep paying on a vehicle I no longer own — but if I skip it my credit takes a hit and the lender might get weird about it.

Has anyone dealt with this exact situation? Do you just keep paying the note while everything gets sorted out? And how do you push back if you disagree with the repair vs. total loss decision? I'm losing sleep over this honestly.

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle