Insurance wants to 'discuss' my injury claim after the at-fault driver had the same carrier — what does that mean?
So back in the spring I was rear-ended pretty hard on the highway. My teenage son was in the passenger seat. We both got taken away by EMS — he had a neck strain and I ended up with a mild concussion plus a messed-up shoulder that I'm still doing PT for. The other driver got cited at the scene, total liability on their end, no dispute there.
Property damage side got sorted out first. They offered me way less than what two body shops quoted. I pushed back, sent the estimates, and eventually got a little more — still not enough to actually replace what I had, but I was exhausted and just wanted the car thing done. Lesson learned, I guess.
Now the same insurance company (yes, the at-fault driver carries the same insurer I do — kind of weird and uncomfortable) is reaching out and saying they want to set up a call to "go over the remaining elements of my claim." I'm guessing that means pain and suffering, medical bills, maybe lost wages since I missed almost two weeks of work.
Here's what I'm not sure about:
- Is this call just them feeling out whether I'll take a quick settlement or sue?
- Should I even talk to them before figuring out if I need a lawyer?
- Does the fact that we share an insurer create any kind of conflict of interest?
My injuries aren't catastrophic but they're real and ongoing. I don't want to get lowballed on the injury side the same way I feel like I did on the car. Anyone been through something like this? What should I know going in?