Insurance wants to total my dad's truck but repairs are way under their own payout offer — can we fight this?
Really frustrated right now and hoping someone here has been through something similar.
My dad got rear-ended at a stoplight about three weeks ago. The other driver was 100% at fault — police report confirms it. The hit crumpled his rear bumper and pushed in the tailgate a little, but the frame looks fine and the airbags never went off. Body shop we trust gave us a written estimate that's comfortably under half of what the insurance company is saying the truck is worth.
Here's where it gets weird: the adjuster is calling it a total loss anyway. They made an offer that's honestly not bad on paper, but my dad has kept this truck immaculate — under 60k miles, full service history, no rust, no previous accidents. He bought it used and has babied it for years. Finding anything comparable for that payout in our area right now? Good luck. Used truck prices are still wild.
He's 71 and doesn't want to deal with car shopping. He wants his truck back.
The adjuster also threw out this comment that really stressed us out — something like "if the shop finds hidden damage during repairs, that could change everything and you might end up with nothing." That felt like a scare tactic to push him toward taking the cash, but I don't actually know if that's true or not.
- Can we push back and request a repair instead of a payout?
- Is that "hidden damage" warning a real risk or just pressure?
- If we accept the total loss payout, does he lose all rights to dispute anything later?
Any advice or experience appreciated. We're not looking to be greedy — we just want his truck fixed and back in his driveway.