Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
curious-owl-393

Insurer approved some repairs but is flat-out ignoring damage in the SAME impact zone — what do I do?

Hey everyone, really hoping someone here has been through something similar because I'm losing my mind over this.

About three weeks ago someone rear-ended me at a red light. Hit was hard enough to jolt me forward into my seatbelt. I reported it to my insurance the same evening, got a claim number, all of that.

The body shop sent in their estimate and my insurer came back and approved repairs to the rear bumper cover — fine, that's the obvious stuff. But they're refusing to cover:

  • A cracked tail light assembly (literally on the same corner that got hit)
  • Damage to the trunk lid that won't close flush anymore
  • A new grinding/creaking noise when I go over any kind of bump or uneven road that was 100% not there before the crash

The shop is telling me they can't move forward on those items without insurer authorization, so my car is just sitting there partially disassembled. The adjuster's line is basically "we don't see enough evidence those items are related to this loss."

A cracked tail light is a safety issue — I could literally get pulled over for it. And the trunk not latching right feels like a structural thing to me, not cosmetic.

Has anyone successfully pushed back when an insurer pulls this "cherry-picking" move? Do I need an independent appraiser? Should I be documenting something specific? I really don't want to lawyer up over what should be a straightforward claim, but I'm also not just going to accept a half-repaired car.

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle