My insurer gave up on subrogation — can I still chase the other party for my deductible?
This whole situation has left me genuinely baffled and I'm hoping someone here has been through something similar.
A while back I was driving on the interstate when a piece of debris — looked like it flew off a flatbed ahead of me — smashed into my hood and windshield. No warning, no time to react, nowhere to go. My insurer eventually ruled I wasn't at fault, which was a relief, but I still had to pay my deductible out of pocket to get my car fixed.
My insurer told me they'd pursue subrogation against the company responsible for the load. Cool, I figured I'd eventually get my deductible back. Fast forward many months and I get a letter basically saying the responsible party denied liability, they couldn't confirm active insurance coverage on that vehicle, and they're closing the file. Done. Goodbye.
The letter did mention — almost as a footnote — that I personally still have the right to pursue reimbursement before some statutory deadline a couple years out.
So now I'm sitting here with questions I can't find straight answers to:
- Is it normal for insurers to just walk away from subrogation like this on freight/commercial claims?
- When they say the other party is "unable to confirm coverage" does that actually mean uninsured, or does it mean something more complicated like the specific policy doesn't cover that type of loss?
- Is it even realistic to take a commercial trucking company to small claims over a deductible? Like what actually happens if they just ignore a judgment?
- Should I be talking to a lawyer before that deadline, even just for a free consult?
I'm not trying to get rich here, I just want my deductible back and I feel like I've been left holding the bag for something that was completely out of my hands. Any guidance appreciated.