Lawyer got me a better offer but after fees I'd take home LESS than the first offer??
I feel like I'm going crazy and need a reality check from people who've been through this.
Got rear-ended on the highway a few months back — herniated two discs and my car was a total loss. Been dealing with PT, missed a ton of work, the whole nightmare.
Insurance came at me pretty fast with an offer. Seemed low but I didn't know what I was doing so I hired an attorney on a contingency basis. They went back and forth with the adjuster and landed on a new number that's noticeably higher than the original offer. On paper it looks like progress.
Here's where my brain broke: once I actually do the math — attorney's contingency cut, medical liens that have to get paid back out of the settlement, a few costs the firm fronted — my actual take-home is lower than what I would've pocketed if I'd just accepted the first offer and paid my own medical bills.
Like... what?
Some questions I'm spinning on:
- Can I even say no to this? My lawyer negotiated it, but it's still my case, right?
- Do I owe them anything if I reject it? I don't want to stiff someone who put in real work, but this math doesn't add up for me.
- Is it worth pushing for more, or do I just take it and move on?
- Am I missing something obvious here?
I genuinely like my attorney and I don't think they're doing anything shady — I just don't understand how ending up with less makes sense. Has anyone been in this spot? What did you do?