Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
sharp-sparrow-007

Not at fault but still being told I have to pay my deductible?? Makes no sense

So I got rear-ended at a red light about six weeks ago. Dead stop, other driver plowed right into me. Police report clearly lists the other driver as at fault — no ambiguity whatsoever. My car had pretty significant damage and I've been dealing with neck and back pain since.

I filed through my own insurance because I wanted things handled quickly. They approved the repairs, great. But then when I asked about my deductible, the adjuster basically told me I'd still have to pay it upfront and they'd try to get it back from the at-fault party's situation — but couldn't promise anything because of how the other driver's coverage is structured.

Wait… what? I'm not at fault. The report says I'm not at fault. Why am I out of pocket for someone else's mistake?

The adjuster kept using phrases like "subrogation process" and "no guarantee of recovery" — which I kind of understand in theory, but it still feels completely backwards. I did nothing wrong and I'm being penalized financially for it.

Has anyone else dealt with this? Did you ever actually get your deductible back, or did it just disappear into the void? And is there anything I can do to push back, or do I just have to accept this and hope for the best?

I'm already stressed about medical bills and missed work — the last thing I need is to also be fighting my own insurance company over money I shouldn't owe in the first place.

7replies

7 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle