Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
keen-crow-431

Not at fault, still drowning — do I actually need a lawyer or am I overthinking this?

Hey everyone. I got rear-ended at a red light about six weeks ago by someone who ran into me pretty hard. Police report is clear — 100% the other driver's fault. No dispute there.

Here's where I'm lost: I'm dealing with neck and upper back pain that's still not resolved, I've been doing physical therapy, and my car was totaled. The other driver's insurance has been okay so far — not hostile, but definitely not rushing to help me either. They keep asking for more documentation and I feel like every week that goes by is just... nothing happening.

I'm also in a tough spot personally. I'm on a pretty tight budget (grad school, part-time job, the whole thing), and I honestly can't afford to make a wrong move here. I keep reading that personal injury lawyers take around a third of whatever you recover, sometimes more if it goes to litigation. So I'm trying to figure out:

  • Is it even worth hiring someone, or will the fees eat up most of what I'd get anyway?
  • What's the difference between just letting PIP handle things vs. actually going after the at-fault driver's liability coverage?
  • If I settle early, am I leaving money on the table — especially since I don't even know yet if my back is going to be a longer-term issue?
  • What are the rookie mistakes people make at this stage that they regret later?

I've had a few free consultations but honestly they all felt like a sales pitch and I left more confused than before. I'm not sleeping well, I'm anxious constantly, and I just want to make a smart decision without getting taken advantage of. Anyone been through something like this?

10replies

10 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle