Other driver got a ticket but her insurance still says my son is 25% at fault — how??
My son was rear-ended at a red light about eight months ago. The other driver was cited at the scene — officer even noted in the report that she was following too closely and failed to stop. Pretty open and shut, right?
Wrong. Her insurance company comes back and says they're accepting 75% liability for their driver and pinning 25% on my son. I genuinely cannot wrap my head around this. He was stopped at a red light. There is no universe where a stopped car is partially responsible for being rear-ended. When I pushed the adjuster on it, she gave me some vague answer about "contributing factors" and basically stonewalled me.
We're still fighting this out, but then something completely unexpected happened this week — my son got a letter from the county prosecutor's office asking him to document any losses, injuries, or expenses he's had because of the crash. Apparently they're looking at whether to pursue charges against the other driver.
I didn't even know that was a thing? Like, can a regular fender-bender (well, it wasn't that minor — his car was totaled and he had a neck injury) turn into a criminal matter? Has anyone ever gotten one of these letters or been through a situation where the DA's office got involved?
Also — does this change anything with the insurance dispute? Does the fact that prosecutors are sniffing around mean we have more leverage to push back on that ridiculous 25% figure?
Any insight from people who've been through something similar would mean a lot. This whole process has been exhausting and we just want it to be over.