Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
bright-elk-228

Other driver's insurance says my husband is 100% at fault — but that's not what happened

Still kind of in shock dealing with this so bear with me.

My husband was heading to an early morning shift last week, driving through an intersection on a stale yellow — not gunning it, just maintaining speed like normal. A guy coming from the opposite direction decided to cut across traffic to make a left turn. Same yellow light, no arrow, nothing protected about it. They collided right in the middle of the intersection.

Now the other guy's insurance is telling us my husband bears full responsibility because he "entered on yellow." But so did the turning driver! From everything I understand, the person making the left turn is supposed to yield to oncoming traffic regardless. That feels like basic driving logic to me.

Here's where it gets complicated:

  • No police came to the scene. They said since it was just property damage they wouldn't respond.
  • The other driver verbally said he thought he could make it — basically admitted he misjudged the gap. My husband heard it, but there's no recording.
  • We do have a dashcam, but the mount snapped during the impact and the camera slid onto the passenger floor. The footage timestamp is way off (never set it up properly) but the actual video shows what happened pretty clearly.
  • Our insurance is handling it but the adjuster seems... not that engaged, honestly.

I guess my questions are: does dashcam footage still matter even with a wrong timestamp? Does the left-turn driver not automatically carry more fault here? And is it normal for the other side's insurance to just declare 100% fault against us right out of the gate like this?

Any experience with this kind of situation would really help right now. 😔

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle