Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
silent-hare-518

Other driver's insurance says I'm 30% at fault for a crash that was clearly not my fault??

I am so frustrated right now and just need to vent and maybe get some perspective from people who've been through something similar.

About three weeks ago I was driving through a shopping center parking lot — barely moving, maybe crawling at walking pace — when a truck shot out of a spot between two big SUVs and plowed straight into my driver's side rear door. I had zero warning. The driver literally didn't even look before reversing.

Here's the thing: there's a camera mounted on the corner of the building right there. I went in, explained what happened, and the store manager was super helpful. I have a copy of the footage on a USB drive. You can see frame by frame that I was already past the entrance to that row when the truck started moving. There's no world in which I could have avoided this.

But the other driver's insurance — after keeping me on hold for what felt like my entire life — came back and said I'm 30% at fault because I was supposedly in a "shared-use traffic area." I don't even fully know what that means, but it sounds like something they just made up to cut their payout.

I escalated to a supervisor and basically got the same scripted response. My car has been in the shop for almost two weeks and I'm still stuck with a rental I wasn't sure I'd even be covered for.

Has anyone dealt with this kind of split-fault nonsense when you had video proof? What actually moves the needle here? Do I need a lawyer or is there another step I should try first?

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle