Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
daring-crane-128

Other driver's insurer says I can only get lost wages because of my policy choice — is that true?

So I got rear-ended on the interstate about two weeks ago. Pretty significant hit — I was fully stopped in slow traffic and the guy behind me wasn't paying attention at all. My car has a decent amount of bumper and trunk damage.

I've been dealing with neck stiffness and some mid-back pain ever since. Went to my doctor yesterday and she wants me to start physical therapy. Nothing confirmed broken or herniated yet but she said soft tissue injuries from rear-end crashes can take weeks to fully show up on imaging.

I filed a claim with the at-fault driver's insurance right away. They called me back pretty fast and said they're accepting full liability, which I guess is good. But then the adjuster dropped something on me that I wasn't expecting — she said that because of the tort option I selected on my own auto policy, my ability to recover damages is limited, and basically all they'd cover is lost wages.

I had no idea when I picked my policy that this choice would matter so much if someone else hit me. Like I thought that option was about my own coverage, not about what I could collect from an at-fault driver.

She also asked me to send over a copy of my declarations page to confirm the coverage election.

A few things I'm trying to figure out:

  • Is it normal for the other driver's insurer to use my policy election against me like this?
  • Should I even send them my dec page without talking to someone first?
  • Does the severity of my injuries change anything here?

I've never dealt with anything like this and honestly the adjuster seemed nice but I have no idea if what she's telling me is accurate or if she's just trying to minimize the payout. Any insight appreciated.

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle