My own insurance blamed me for a rear-end crash I have on dashcam — how is this real?
I genuinely cannot believe I'm typing this but here we go.
A few months back I was sitting at a red light — completely stopped, nobody in front of me — when I got slammed from behind. Hard enough that my car got pushed into the intersection. The driver behind me didn't brake at all, based on what witnesses said. Police came, wrote up the report, and it's pretty clear who caused what.
Here's where it gets wild: my own insurance company comes back and tells me I'm partially at fault because I was "in a position where the collision was foreseeable." I don't even know what that means for a stopped car at a red light??
My dashcam caught the whole thing. I uploaded it and sent it over immediately. They acknowledged receiving it. And still — partial fault on me.
Since then:
- They lowballed my car's value by what feels like several thousand based on comps I found myself
- My premium jumped significantly at renewal even though I didn't cause anything
- Every time I call I get a different rep who seems to have never read my file
I've been dealing with neck and shoulder pain since the accident and I'm still going to PT. So this isn't just about the car — there's a real injury piece too that I'm worried they're going to lowball or ignore.
Is this normal adjuster behavior or does this cross into something more serious like bad faith? Has anyone successfully pushed back on a fault determination when you had video proof? I feel like I'm screaming into a void here.
Any insight appreciated — even just knowing others have been through this helps.