Rear-ended, 0% at fault — will my car get repaired or totaled? Anyone been through this?
Hey everyone, first time posting here and honestly just looking for some real-world perspective from people who've been through something similar.
About three weeks ago I was sitting at a red light when someone plowed into the back of my car at what felt like a pretty decent speed. The other driver was cited at the scene, and my insurer has confirmed I'm carrying zero fault. So at least that part isn't a battle.
The damage looks pretty rough to me — rear bumper is basically destroyed, one of my rear panels has a visible crumple, and the trunk doesn't close right anymore. I'm worried there might be frame or structural stuff going on underneath too, but I'm not a mechanic so I genuinely can't tell.
The insurance company has it at their preferred shop right now for an estimate and I'm just... waiting. Which is the worst.
A few things I'm trying to figure out from people who've been here:
1. Repair vs. total loss — Based on the kind of damage I'm describing, does this sound more like a repair situation or does it lean toward a total loss? My car isn't brand new but it's not a junker either — probably mid-range market value.
2. The threshold question — At what point do insurers typically decide it's cheaper to total a car than fix it? Is there like an informal percentage of the car's value that triggers that decision?
3. OEM vs. aftermarket parts — If they do repair it, do I have any say in whether they use original manufacturer parts? I've heard some insurers default to cheaper aftermarket stuff.
Not asking for legal advice — just want to hear from people who've actually dealt with this. What should I expect? What should I be pushing back on?
Thanks in advance 🙏