Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
quiet-wren-492

Rear-ended my 3-month-old truck and insurance wants to repair it — should I push for a total loss?

I'm still kind of in shock about this whole situation and need some outside perspective.

Back in early spring I bought a brand-new pickup — had maybe 1,800 miles on it, still had that new-truck smell. Last week some guy blew through a red light at what witnesses said was close to highway speed and absolutely slammed into my rear end while I was sitting still waiting to turn. His car was destroyed. Mine is still drivable, but the rear end looks rough.

Insurance sent an adjuster out who looked at it for maybe 20 minutes and said it's "repairable." But when I talked to the body shop, even they seemed hesitant — they mentioned the rear frame rails took the hit and there's some structural deformation behind the rear axle. The adjuster is acting like that's totally fine to weld and patch.

Here's what's eating at me:

  • This truck had zero prior damage. The structural integrity was factory-perfect.
  • The crumple zones in the rear did their job... which means they're used up now, right?
  • My insurance seems annoyed every time I ask follow-up questions, like I'm being difficult

I genuinely don't know if I'm overreacting or if this is a real concern. Should I be demanding an independent appraisal? Is there such a thing as a "diminished value" claim for a truck this new? I feel like once frame damage is on the Carfax, this vehicle loses serious resale value even if it drives perfectly.

Has anyone else fought their insurance company on something like this? How did you approach it without them just stonewalling you?

9replies

9 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle