Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
hearty-dove-341

Update: insurer tried to say my commute wasn't covered — here's how it ended

Hey everyone — I posted a few weeks ago absolutely spiraling because my insurance company was telling me my accident wasn't covered. The reason they gave me? That I was "operating the vehicle for purposes beyond personal use" because I had a work laptop in my back seat and sometimes use my car to drive between job sites. I want to scream typing that out again.

Quick recap: I got rear-ended pretty badly on my way into work. Not for work — just the normal commute literally every person with a job makes. The at-fault driver's insurance was being slow, so I went through my own carrier to get things moving. That's when the nightmare started.

Three different reps backed up this interpretation. One of them actually read me policy language that, when I looked it up myself later, said nothing of the sort. I filed a complaint with my state's insurance commissioner and — on the advice of someone on this forum actually — I also got a PI attorney on the phone. The attorney told me this was a textbook bad-faith move and that my policy clearly covered me.

I pushed for a supervisor escalation in writing, cc'd the commissioner complaint number in my email, and within 48 hours I had a new adjuster assigned and a coverage confirmation letter in my inbox.

Moral of the story: don't just accept what the first (or third) rep tells you. Get everything in writing, escalate in writing, and do not be afraid to loop in a lawyer or your state's insurance department. It worked for me.

Still dealing with the physical recovery side of things, but at least the coverage battle is behind me. Hang in there, everyone. 🙏

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle