Matlock & Partners← Back to AskMatlock
The Shoulder
bold-fox-250

On workers' comp after on-duty crash — is suing the other driver even worth it?

So I work for the county highway department and last month I was out on a job site when some guy blew through a temporary traffic control zone and clipped our work truck pretty hard. I was inside the cab and got thrown around enough to crack a rib and mess up my knee ligaments pretty badly. Surgeon says I'm looking at least 4-5 months before I'm anywhere close to returning to work.

Workers' comp kicked in and is covering my medical bills and a portion of my lost wages. Fine, I'm grateful for that. But a few of my coworkers keep nudging me to go after the driver who hit us — he was apparently on his phone and completely ignored the posted signs and flaggers.

Here's where I'm confused: if I hire a PI attorney and actually win something from the at-fault driver's insurance, doesn't my employer's workers' comp carrier just swoop in with a lien and take most of it back anyway? Like what's actually left for me at the end of that?

I get that workers' comp handles the bills and lost time, but what about pain and suffering? My knee has been a nightmare — I can't sleep, can't help with stuff around the house, my whole routine is wrecked. Does comp cover any of that, or is that only something a third-party claim could get me?

I'm not a legal person at all so I'm probably misunderstanding how this works. Just trying to figure out if pursuing the driver is actually worth the hassle or if I'd basically be doing it for nothing. Anyone been through both workers' comp AND a third-party claim at the same time?

8replies

8 replies

Most helpful first

0 / 4000 · posted under a randomly assigned handle